Ramsey Flux (![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} samuraikoala32) wrote,@ 2008-03-27 13:09:00 |
|
Unfiltered Election Thoughts
The presidential election really bothers me. I can't stand the candidates at all, they're so fake and I see right through them, yet it seems that the majority of the country thinks they're genuine. Alright, maybe McCain is pretty up-front with the fact that he's not really against the war or "defending our country from terrorists" (i.e. stripping the American people of more freedoms), but Clinton and Obama are fake as fuck. Now IF I believed in the system and IF I didn't know any better, I would probably support Obama over the others because he's well-spoken, and seemingly likeable... other than the whole pro-Israel standpoint that implies he'd like me and the other Palestinian people to be extinct (like we're not already endangered). Obama keeps talking about change, which makes people pumped up and ready to support him. Change doesn't mean he'd nessecarily make anything better, change just means he'd make things DIFFERENT. Hillary keeps calling him out for advocating change but not talking about what exactly what he would change, when she herself does the exact same thing.
And I fucking hate all this, "oh, Hillary's so experienced" horseshit. So she was a senator for a few years, that means everyone else that has been in the senate just as long is just as experienced, and that the older ones are therefore MORE experienced and more qualified to be president, but that's horribly flawed logic. Does anyone even remember how she became senator? I haven't forgotten!!
This was all over the news several years ago, when she decided she wanted to be a senator for New York, but there was one little problem: To be a senator of New York, you have to have lived in New York for at least a day (which she had not... anyone remember this yet?). So she moved to New York-- for a day-- and successfully became senator of New York. If you ask me, if I were a New Yorker who believed in the representative republican government system, I'd want the person who represents me in the senate to ACTUALLY FUCKING REPRESENT ME!!! If someone from New York moved to Utah for a day and expected people to vote for them for senate, they wouldn't be taken seriously at all because some angry city-slicker doesn't have a fucking clue how to accurately represent a dry state where everyone's a brainwashed Mormon with 4 to 7 wives.
Oh, and there's one more teeny tiny little thing that apparently 98% of the country is entirely unaware of, and it's that McCain, Obama, and Clinton are ALL members of the Council on Foreign Relations. What's the CFR? They're a "non-government" organization formed in the early 1900s that is considered to be one of "the greatest predictors of American government policies." The truth is they ARE the policy-makers. The CFR is just a public front for the Bilderberg Group (Google it), which has been around since the mid-50's and still has yet to be mentioned in any mainstream newspapers or shows. The Bilderberg Group is made up of American politicans, foreign monarchs, foreign diplomats, top bank owners, owners of various top-grossing companies like Microsoft, top journalists and news anchors (tell me THAT'S not dangerous), and even religious officials; What they do is meet in secret every year at a big top-secret conference to discuss measures that will be taken in the next year, and years to come. If you don't believe it, there's a good documentary by Alex Jones called "Endgame" in which they stake it out and catch all sorts of famous politicans and diplomats on film, including figures like the Queen of the Netherlands. CFR and Bilderberg share many of the same members, but not all, and there's also a huge membership overlap in the Trilateral Comission and Bohemian Grove (Google that too) as well. There's LOTS of books, videos, websites, and documentaries exposing the conspiracy, so now there's no excuse not to look into it because NOW YOU KNOW.
If you're still not convinced, the framework for what these groups stand for is outlined in a document entitled "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars," that former Naval Intelligence member Bill Cooper swears he has seen in top-secret files as the cornerstone of the Bilderberg Group, and you can read it here: http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/s
Read it in it's entirety. It'll either awaken you to the truth, or you'll reject every word and go back to sleep.
The fact that McCain, Clinton, and Obama are all members is a huge conflict of interest. Evidence for McCain and Clinton being members is easy to find on the internet, but Obama is a little tougher to associate with CFR because that information keeps jumping around for some reason (bet I know why).
Any child expert can tell you that if you want to get your toddler to do something, it doesn't work to tell them what you want them to do, and instead you must give them percieved freedom. For example: you want your kid to put on a sweater. If you say, "Put on this sweater, please." you're gonna get a, "NO!" response. Now if you change that to, "Which sweater do you want to wear, blue or red?" they'll put on the sweater, thinking they had a choice. The fact that this is what you do with kids makes it very basic psychology, therefore the concept applies to all humans. Kind of like how instead of saying, "we want you to support your government," they say "pick a political party. are you democrat, or republican?" The fact that there are 3 choices is meaningless when they all have the same goal.
So you get 3 choices: a woman, a black guy, and a dirty Republican warmonger, but they're all going to fuck you over the exact same way. Which do you pick? Who cares? The powers that be have decided that Hillary's going to be your next president whether you like it or not, but at least you'll get to say, "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for Hil-dog."
Well, at least Obama would make the best-looking fake president. I'm voting for Ron Paul. Not because I believe he'll win, not because I believe my vote makes a difference (because it doesn't), but just in principle because he's the only candidate who's not a CFR member, he's against the Federal Reserve, against the IRS, against the patriot act, against the United Nations, and understands that the point of the second amendment is for the people to defend themselves in the case of government corruption (that's the concept this country was supposedley founded on, remember?). Not to say he's perfect, but his strengths sure as hell outweigh his flaws, not to mention the fact that he's really a Libertarian running as a Republican to gain "credibility" in our biased 2-party system. Look what CFR themselves have to say about Ron Paul: http://www.cfr.org/bios/13303/ron_p
That's right, he voted against EVERYTHING, including the Military Comissions Act. For those who don't know, the Military Comissions Act of 2006 did away with the writ of habeas corpus, the citizen's right to call for a trial and witnesses to testify on their behalf in the case of false imprisonment. Is there any possible, legitimate reason that someone should not be able to get a trial when they claim they were falsely imprisoned? No, no there is not. And now, under the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (HR 1955) that was just passed, the government can put ANYBODY away if they claim that the subject so much as THOUGHT of committing a terrorist act. No evidence nessecary, just some douchebag fed claiming you "thought" about comitting a terrorist act. Welcome to the Orwellian police state that nobody thought would ever happen... look out for the thought police. BE WARY that the government can now legally lock you up with zero evidence and you won't be able to do a damn thing and nobody can save you because habeas corpus is gone. Yeah, I really appreciate Paul voting against that.
EDIT (04.03.08): Finally, Obama addresses a question in which he is asked if he is a CFR member. He says, "I don’t know if I’m an official member. I’ve spoken there before. It basically is a forum where people talk about foreign policy. There is no official membership. I don’t have a card, or you know a special handshake or anything like that." BULLSHIT. On the CFR's FAQ page, it states: "Every candidate for membership must be a U.S. citizen or a permanent resident with an application for citizenship pending. Candidates are formally proposed in writing by one member and seconded by a minimum of three other individuals. Letters of support from members (as opposed to non-members) are strongly encouraged. Quality, diversity, and balance are the key objectives sought by the Council in the composition of its membership." How is that not official membership?
Regarding the North American union and New World Order, he said, "I see no evidence of this actually taking place. I think this is something that has been ginned up on certain blogs and the Internet. It was based mostly on the fact that there is this highway being built in Texas that will facilitate transportation more transportation between Mexico and the intercontinental United States and Canada...NAFTA helped to break down barriers, but I don’t think there is some conspiracy to create this one continental government." Yeah, that's it. Not like there's been hundreds of books on the subject of New World Order since the birth of the nation, it must be an internet hoax.
---Source: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_no_
The presidential election really bothers me. I can't stand the candidates at all, they're so fake and I see right through them, yet it seems that the majority of the country thinks they're genuine. Alright, maybe McCain is pretty up-front with the fact that he's not really against the war or "defending our country from terrorists" (i.e. stripping the American people of more freedoms), but Clinton and Obama are fake as fuck. Now IF I believed in the system and IF I didn't know any better, I would probably support Obama over the others because he's well-spoken, and seemingly likeable... other than the whole pro-Israel standpoint that implies he'd like me and the other Palestinian people to be extinct (like we're not already endangered). Obama keeps talking about change, which makes people pumped up and ready to support him. Change doesn't mean he'd nessecarily make anything better, change just means he'd make things DIFFERENT. Hillary keeps calling him out for advocating change but not talking about what exactly what he would change, when she herself does the exact same thing.
And I fucking hate all this, "oh, Hillary's so experienced" horseshit. So she was a senator for a few years, that means everyone else that has been in the senate just as long is just as experienced, and that the older ones are therefore MORE experienced and more qualified to be president, but that's horribly flawed logic. Does anyone even remember how she became senator? I haven't forgotten!!
This was all over the news several years ago, when she decided she wanted to be a senator for New York, but there was one little problem: To be a senator of New York, you have to have lived in New York for at least a day (which she had not... anyone remember this yet?). So she moved to New York-- for a day-- and successfully became senator of New York. If you ask me, if I were a New Yorker who believed in the representative republican government system, I'd want the person who represents me in the senate to ACTUALLY FUCKING REPRESENT ME!!! If someone from New York moved to Utah for a day and expected people to vote for them for senate, they wouldn't be taken seriously at all because some angry city-slicker doesn't have a fucking clue how to accurately represent a dry state where everyone's a brainwashed Mormon with 4 to 7 wives.
Oh, and there's one more teeny tiny little thing that apparently 98% of the country is entirely unaware of, and it's that McCain, Obama, and Clinton are ALL members of the Council on Foreign Relations. What's the CFR? They're a "non-government" organization formed in the early 1900s that is considered to be one of "the greatest predictors of American government policies." The truth is they ARE the policy-makers. The CFR is just a public front for the Bilderberg Group (Google it), which has been around since the mid-50's and still has yet to be mentioned in any mainstream newspapers or shows. The Bilderberg Group is made up of American politicans, foreign monarchs, foreign diplomats, top bank owners, owners of various top-grossing companies like Microsoft, top journalists and news anchors (tell me THAT'S not dangerous), and even religious officials; What they do is meet in secret every year at a big top-secret conference to discuss measures that will be taken in the next year, and years to come. If you don't believe it, there's a good documentary by Alex Jones called "Endgame" in which they stake it out and catch all sorts of famous politicans and diplomats on film, including figures like the Queen of the Netherlands. CFR and Bilderberg share many of the same members, but not all, and there's also a huge membership overlap in the Trilateral Comission and Bohemian Grove (Google that too) as well. There's LOTS of books, videos, websites, and documentaries exposing the conspiracy, so now there's no excuse not to look into it because NOW YOU KNOW.
If you're still not convinced, the framework for what these groups stand for is outlined in a document entitled "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars," that former Naval Intelligence member Bill Cooper swears he has seen in top-secret files as the cornerstone of the Bilderberg Group, and you can read it here: http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/s
Read it in it's entirety. It'll either awaken you to the truth, or you'll reject every word and go back to sleep.
The fact that McCain, Clinton, and Obama are all members is a huge conflict of interest. Evidence for McCain and Clinton being members is easy to find on the internet, but Obama is a little tougher to associate with CFR because that information keeps jumping around for some reason (bet I know why).
Any child expert can tell you that if you want to get your toddler to do something, it doesn't work to tell them what you want them to do, and instead you must give them percieved freedom. For example: you want your kid to put on a sweater. If you say, "Put on this sweater, please." you're gonna get a, "NO!" response. Now if you change that to, "Which sweater do you want to wear, blue or red?" they'll put on the sweater, thinking they had a choice. The fact that this is what you do with kids makes it very basic psychology, therefore the concept applies to all humans. Kind of like how instead of saying, "we want you to support your government," they say "pick a political party. are you democrat, or republican?" The fact that there are 3 choices is meaningless when they all have the same goal.
So you get 3 choices: a woman, a black guy, and a dirty Republican warmonger, but they're all going to fuck you over the exact same way. Which do you pick? Who cares? The powers that be have decided that Hillary's going to be your next president whether you like it or not, but at least you'll get to say, "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for Hil-dog."
Well, at least Obama would make the best-looking fake president. I'm voting for Ron Paul. Not because I believe he'll win, not because I believe my vote makes a difference (because it doesn't), but just in principle because he's the only candidate who's not a CFR member, he's against the Federal Reserve, against the IRS, against the patriot act, against the United Nations, and understands that the point of the second amendment is for the people to defend themselves in the case of government corruption (that's the concept this country was supposedley founded on, remember?). Not to say he's perfect, but his strengths sure as hell outweigh his flaws, not to mention the fact that he's really a Libertarian running as a Republican to gain "credibility" in our biased 2-party system. Look what CFR themselves have to say about Ron Paul: http://www.cfr.org/bios/13303/ron_p
That's right, he voted against EVERYTHING, including the Military Comissions Act. For those who don't know, the Military Comissions Act of 2006 did away with the writ of habeas corpus, the citizen's right to call for a trial and witnesses to testify on their behalf in the case of false imprisonment. Is there any possible, legitimate reason that someone should not be able to get a trial when they claim they were falsely imprisoned? No, no there is not. And now, under the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (HR 1955) that was just passed, the government can put ANYBODY away if they claim that the subject so much as THOUGHT of committing a terrorist act. No evidence nessecary, just some douchebag fed claiming you "thought" about comitting a terrorist act. Welcome to the Orwellian police state that nobody thought would ever happen... look out for the thought police. BE WARY that the government can now legally lock you up with zero evidence and you won't be able to do a damn thing and nobody can save you because habeas corpus is gone. Yeah, I really appreciate Paul voting against that.
EDIT (04.03.08): Finally, Obama addresses a question in which he is asked if he is a CFR member. He says, "I don’t know if I’m an official member. I’ve spoken there before. It basically is a forum where people talk about foreign policy. There is no official membership. I don’t have a card, or you know a special handshake or anything like that." BULLSHIT. On the CFR's FAQ page, it states: "Every candidate for membership must be a U.S. citizen or a permanent resident with an application for citizenship pending. Candidates are formally proposed in writing by one member and seconded by a minimum of three other individuals. Letters of support from members (as opposed to non-members) are strongly encouraged. Quality, diversity, and balance are the key objectives sought by the Council in the composition of its membership." How is that not official membership?
Regarding the North American union and New World Order, he said, "I see no evidence of this actually taking place. I think this is something that has been ginned up on certain blogs and the Internet. It was based mostly on the fact that there is this highway being built in Texas that will facilitate transportation more transportation between Mexico and the intercontinental United States and Canada...NAFTA helped to break down barriers, but I don’t think there is some conspiracy to create this one continental government." Yeah, that's it. Not like there's been hundreds of books on the subject of New World Order since the birth of the nation, it must be an internet hoax.
---Source: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_no_
